<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 746 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration in light of judicial pronouncements. The appellant was directed to provide evidence supporting their claims regarding Cenvat credit issues. The stay application was disposed of, with instructions for the adjudicating authority to afford the appellant a fair opportunity to present their defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 746 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration in light of judicial pronouncements. The appellant was directed to provide evidence supporting their claims regarding Cenvat credit issues. The stay application was disposed of, with instructions for the adjudicating authority to afford the appellant a fair opportunity to present their defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>