https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215239 The Bombay High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the attachment of a residential flat co-owned by a partner of a firm for recovery of tax dues. The court emphasized the need for evidence examination and oral testimony, declining to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner was given the option to appeal before the Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and seek interim relief within four weeks to halt the sale of the flat until the application is decided. No costs were awarded, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings. en-us Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Jul 2012 09:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215239 The Bombay High Court dismissed the Writ Petition challenging the attachment of a residential flat co-owned by a partner of a firm for recovery of tax dues. The court emphasized the need for evidence examination and oral testimony, declining to intervene under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner was given the option to appeal before the Commissioner/Chief Commissioner of Income-tax and seek interim relief within four weeks to halt the sale of the flat until the application is decided. No costs were awarded, leaving all contentions open for further proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215239