https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215217 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for 10% of the value of goods supplied to SEZ developers during 2008-2009. The Tribunal relied on previous judgments, including Sujana Metal Products Limited vs. CCE Hyderabad and Sujako Interiors Pvt. Limited, to establish that the issue had been settled. The judgment emphasized that the requirement for the appellant to pay the 10% amount was no longer open for debate, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jul 2012 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215217 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for 10% of the value of goods supplied to SEZ developers during 2008-2009. The Tribunal relied on previous judgments, including Sujana Metal Products Limited vs. CCE Hyderabad and Sujako Interiors Pvt. Limited, to establish that the issue had been settled. The judgment emphasized that the requirement for the appellant to pay the 10% amount was no longer open for debate, resulting in a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215217