https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215215 Exemption under Notification No. 108/95-CE was confined to goods supplied directly to an approved project financed by an international organisation and supported by the prescribed certification; supply to an intermediary contractor did not satisfy that condition, so the exemption was unavailable. Cum-duty price treatment was also upheld because the Revenue's objection rested on a review petition that had already been dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving no basis to disturb the benefit. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215215 Exemption under Notification No. 108/95-CE was confined to goods supplied directly to an approved project financed by an international organisation and supported by the prescribed certification; supply to an intermediary contractor did not satisfy that condition, so the exemption was unavailable. Cum-duty price treatment was also upheld because the Revenue's objection rested on a review petition that had already been dismissed by the Supreme Court, leaving no basis to disturb the benefit. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215215