https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215206 The appeal was allowed on both merits and limitation grounds. The Tribunal held that the appellant's non-consulting services were not taxable under consulting engineer services. Additionally, the demand for service tax was considered barred by limitation due to the appellant's regular compliance and disclosure of service bifurcation. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalties was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215206 The appeal was allowed on both merits and limitation grounds. The Tribunal held that the appellant's non-consulting services were not taxable under consulting engineer services. Additionally, the demand for service tax was considered barred by limitation due to the appellant's regular compliance and disclosure of service bifurcation. The impugned order confirming the service tax demand, interest, and penalties was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215206