<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 690 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215191</link>
    <description>Income from composite contract arrangements was attributed to India because the linked obligations were examined together, and the presence of a permanent establishment supported taxation of the related profits in India. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case for the preceding year, noted that no fresh material had been produced despite opportunity, and found no factual difference warranting a departure. The earlier profit estimate of 7% on the relevant receipts was therefore maintained, with no basis to disturb the existing assessment approach.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 06:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 690 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215191</link>
      <description>Income from composite contract arrangements was attributed to India because the linked obligations were examined together, and the presence of a permanent establishment supported taxation of the related profits in India. The Tribunal followed its earlier view in the assessee&#039;s own case for the preceding year, noted that no fresh material had been produced despite opportunity, and found no factual difference warranting a departure. The earlier profit estimate of 7% on the relevant receipts was therefore maintained, with no basis to disturb the existing assessment approach.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>