<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 673 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215174</link>
    <description>The Tribunal analyzed the classification of sugar syrup and flavour under Central Excise Tariff headings, focusing on marketability and duty liability. It determined that the invert sugar syrup manufactured by the appellants was marketable, based on its properties and legal precedents. The case was remanded for further examination of marketability to ascertain duty liability accurately, following principles from a relevant precedent case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 673 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215174</link>
      <description>The Tribunal analyzed the classification of sugar syrup and flavour under Central Excise Tariff headings, focusing on marketability and duty liability. It determined that the invert sugar syrup manufactured by the appellants was marketable, based on its properties and legal precedents. The case was remanded for further examination of marketability to ascertain duty liability accurately, following principles from a relevant precedent case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>