https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215172 The court upheld the validity of Section 5(2) of the DVAT Act, 2004 and Rule 3(2) of the DVAT Rules, 2005, dismissing the challenge to their constitutionality. It also rejected the argument that the impugned orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice, suggesting this could be raised in the petitioners' appeals. The writ petitions were dismissed, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Sep 2012 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215172 The court upheld the validity of Section 5(2) of the DVAT Act, 2004 and Rule 3(2) of the DVAT Rules, 2005, dismissing the challenge to their constitutionality. It also rejected the argument that the impugned orders were passed in violation of principles of natural justice, suggesting this could be raised in the petitioners' appeals. The writ petitions were dismissed, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215172