<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 669 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by the appellant under taxable categories, denied claimed exemptions, and found the demand for service tax largely within the normal period. The Tribunal also held that the appellant&#039;s overhauling services were taxable and that there was no sufficient evidence of financial hardship to warrant a full waiver of pre-deposit. The appellant was directed to make a substantial pre-deposit to proceed with the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 669 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of services provided by the appellant under taxable categories, denied claimed exemptions, and found the demand for service tax largely within the normal period. The Tribunal also held that the appellant&#039;s overhauling services were taxable and that there was no sufficient evidence of financial hardship to warrant a full waiver of pre-deposit. The appellant was directed to make a substantial pre-deposit to proceed with the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>