<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 667 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Compliance Services do not fall under Management Consultancy Service. The demand for Rs. 3,53,05,405/- was deemed time-barred as the appellants acted in good faith based on CBEC circulars, and there was no suppression of facts. The Tribunal emphasized that penalizing the appellants for relying on official clarifications would be unjust, invalidating the extended period for demand under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 667 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling that Compliance Services do not fall under Management Consultancy Service. The demand for Rs. 3,53,05,405/- was deemed time-barred as the appellants acted in good faith based on CBEC circulars, and there was no suppression of facts. The Tribunal emphasized that penalizing the appellants for relying on official clarifications would be unjust, invalidating the extended period for demand under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>