<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 658 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215159</link>
    <description>The Third Member upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee, concluding that the explanation for the erroneous claim was not bona fide. The Division Bench, concurring with the majority view, dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 658 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215159</link>
      <description>The Third Member upheld the penalty under section 271(1)(c) against the assessee, concluding that the explanation for the erroneous claim was not bona fide. The Division Bench, concurring with the majority view, dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, confirming the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>