<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 649 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215150</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and confirmed the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s orders on all issues, including restricting trading addition, deleting additions for interest income, commission received, bogus unsecured creditors, lottery winnings, and income of M/s. Aman Enterprises. The tribunal found the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s decisions well-founded, based on factual analysis, and unchallenged by the department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 649 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215150</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and confirmed the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s orders on all issues, including restricting trading addition, deleting additions for interest income, commission received, bogus unsecured creditors, lottery winnings, and income of M/s. Aman Enterprises. The tribunal found the Ld. CIT (A)&#039;s decisions well-founded, based on factual analysis, and unchallenged by the department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>