https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215142 A later special foreign exchange statute prevailed over the repealed law for appeals governed by its scheme, and the High Court's power to condone delay was confined to the statutory outer limit of sixty days. The saving provisions for repeal did not preserve the wider condonation regime of the earlier law because the later enactment showed a contrary legislative intention. The Limitation Act could not be used to enlarge that limit. The right to appeal remained substantive, but condonation beyond the prescribed period was only procedural and contingent, not vested as of right. en-us Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Mar 2013 09:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215142 A later special foreign exchange statute prevailed over the repealed law for appeals governed by its scheme, and the High Court's power to condone delay was confined to the statutory outer limit of sixty days. The saving provisions for repeal did not preserve the wider condonation regime of the earlier law because the later enactment showed a contrary legislative intention. The Limitation Act could not be used to enlarge that limit. The right to appeal remained substantive, but condonation beyond the prescribed period was only procedural and contingent, not vested as of right. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215142