<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 633 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215134</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activity of supplying and installing structural steel canopies constituted &#039;Commercial or Industrial construction service&#039; taxable from 10/9/04. The Tribunal directed a reassessment of service tax calculation, specifying levying tax on the gross amount received minus abatement until 30/5/07, and thereafter based on specific rules. Regarding time limitation and penalty, the Commissioner was instructed to reevaluate if the extended limitation period applied and if penalty under Section 78 was warranted. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication based on the provided directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 633 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215134</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s activity of supplying and installing structural steel canopies constituted &#039;Commercial or Industrial construction service&#039; taxable from 10/9/04. The Tribunal directed a reassessment of service tax calculation, specifying levying tax on the gross amount received minus abatement until 30/5/07, and thereafter based on specific rules. Regarding time limitation and penalty, the Commissioner was instructed to reevaluate if the extended limitation period applied and if penalty under Section 78 was warranted. The Tribunal set aside the previous order, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication based on the provided directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>