<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 629 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215130</link>
    <description>The judgment favored the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and penalties imposed, highlighting the confusion surrounding the nature of services provided and emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 629 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215130</link>
      <description>The judgment favored the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and penalties imposed, highlighting the confusion surrounding the nature of services provided and emphasizing the need for clarity in understanding the levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215130</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>