<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 625 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer in three grounds of appeal. The additions for unexplained cash credits, loss of goods, and low gross profit were all dismissed. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient explanations and evidence to prove the legitimacy of the transactions and deductions, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 625 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer in three grounds of appeal. The additions for unexplained cash credits, loss of goods, and low gross profit were all dismissed. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient explanations and evidence to prove the legitimacy of the transactions and deductions, leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>