<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 605 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal to the extent of penalty imposition, finding the appellant&#039;s explanation for the shortage of copper wire and strip to be reasonable and supported by records. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence to establish clandestine removal, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2012 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 605 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal to the extent of penalty imposition, finding the appellant&#039;s explanation for the shortage of copper wire and strip to be reasonable and supported by records. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence to establish clandestine removal, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>