<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 604 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215105</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order of the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, directing the petitioner to deposit Rs.100 Lakhs for hearing the appeal, as it failed to consider undue hardship to the assessee adequately. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance on balancing undue hardship and Revenue interests when considering waiver applications under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment before making a determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 604 - CHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215105</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order of the Customs, Excise &amp;amp; Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, directing the petitioner to deposit Rs.100 Lakhs for hearing the appeal, as it failed to consider undue hardship to the assessee adequately. The case was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s guidance on balancing undue hardship and Revenue interests when considering waiver applications under Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the need for a thorough assessment before making a determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>