<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 595 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215096</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) for concealing income. The appellant&#039;s failure to disclose the sale of the plot resulted in the concealment of income, as determined by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the penalty was rightly imposed, as the appellant did not disclose the transaction voluntarily, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 595 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215096</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(C) for concealing income. The appellant&#039;s failure to disclose the sale of the plot resulted in the concealment of income, as determined by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Tribunal found that the penalty was rightly imposed, as the appellant did not disclose the transaction voluntarily, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>