https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215074 The tribunal remanded the case concerning denial of CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid on banking and financial services due to incorrect invoicing. The appellant's argument that services were provided to them despite invoices being issued in the name of a different unit was supported by City Bank's acknowledgment and certification. Discrepancies in dates between bills and certificates raised by the Commissioner (Appeals) were noted, leading to the matter being remanded for a fresh decision. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present additional details to substantiate their claim, with the impugned order set aside for reconsideration. en-us Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215074 The tribunal remanded the case concerning denial of CENVAT Credit for Service Tax paid on banking and financial services due to incorrect invoicing. The appellant's argument that services were provided to them despite invoices being issued in the name of a different unit was supported by City Bank's acknowledgment and certification. Discrepancies in dates between bills and certificates raised by the Commissioner (Appeals) were noted, leading to the matter being remanded for a fresh decision. The appellant was granted the opportunity to present additional details to substantiate their claim, with the impugned order set aside for reconsideration. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215074