<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 555 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215055</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the deduction eligibility based on the amount invested before the return filing date, in accordance with Sec. 54F(4). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of utilizing the investment amount for the new residential property before the return filing date, aligning with the P&amp;amp;H High Court&#039;s interpretation of section 139.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 555 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215055</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the deduction eligibility based on the amount invested before the return filing date, in accordance with Sec. 54F(4). The Tribunal emphasized the importance of utilizing the investment amount for the new residential property before the return filing date, aligning with the P&amp;amp;H High Court&#039;s interpretation of section 139.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>