<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 540 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2007-08. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing primary facts and the technical nature of the mistake in withdrawing the claim. The decision was based on the principle that penalties should not be imposed for minor or technical errors when all relevant details were disclosed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 540 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to delete the penalty under section 271(1)(c) for A.Y. 2007-08. The judgment emphasized the importance of disclosing primary facts and the technical nature of the mistake in withdrawing the claim. The decision was based on the principle that penalties should not be imposed for minor or technical errors when all relevant details were disclosed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>