<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 538 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215038</link>
    <description>Service tax could not be levied in India on the recipient of services received from foreign-based providers before Section 66A came into force on 18.04.2006. The charging provision taxed the person rendering the service, and liability could not be shifted to the recipient by delegated rules or a notification in the absence of statutory authority. Rule 2(d)(iv) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and Notification No. 12/2002-ST were insufficient to create the levy. The demand for the prior period was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188429" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 538 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215038</link>
      <description>Service tax could not be levied in India on the recipient of services received from foreign-based providers before Section 66A came into force on 18.04.2006. The charging provision taxed the person rendering the service, and liability could not be shifted to the recipient by delegated rules or a notification in the absence of statutory authority. Rule 2(d)(iv) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and Notification No. 12/2002-ST were insufficient to create the levy. The demand for the prior period was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>