https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215037 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' classification of the product under Chapter 17, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was deemed adequate at 25% of the duty liability. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to set aside the remaining penalty amount imposed by the adjudicating authority and upheld by the first appellate authority. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Nov 2013 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215037 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' classification of the product under Chapter 17, rejecting the Revenue's appeal. The penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, was deemed adequate at 25% of the duty liability. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to set aside the remaining penalty amount imposed by the adjudicating authority and upheld by the first appellate authority. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215037