https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215032 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to an appeal under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, because the special statute prescribes a fixed thirty-day limitation period and omits any enabling provision for condonation. The statutory scheme distinguishes Section 30 from Section 19 and Section 20(3), where reference to the Limitation Act and express power to entertain delayed appeals are provided. Reading the Act with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, the legislative intent is to exclude general condonation principles for Section 30 appeals, and the appellate authority cannot enlarge that remedy through the Rules. en-us Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215032 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to an appeal under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, because the special statute prescribes a fixed thirty-day limitation period and omits any enabling provision for condonation. The statutory scheme distinguishes Section 30 from Section 19 and Section 20(3), where reference to the Limitation Act and express power to entertain delayed appeals are provided. Reading the Act with Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act, the legislative intent is to exclude general condonation principles for Section 30 appeals, and the appellate authority cannot enlarge that remedy through the Rules. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215032