<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 973 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215027</link>
    <description>Under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the Magistrate&#039;s inquiry is confined to verifying territorial jurisdiction over the secured asset and service of notice under section 13(2). Disputed objections about compliance with the Act, including alleged irregularities in measures under section 13(4), cannot be adjudicated at that stage and must be pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17. An order that examined the merits of such non-compliance went beyond the limited scope of section 14 and was contrary to binding law; the rejection of the application was set aside and directions were issued to proceed under section 14.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 973 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215027</link>
      <description>Under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, the Magistrate&#039;s inquiry is confined to verifying territorial jurisdiction over the secured asset and service of notice under section 13(2). Disputed objections about compliance with the Act, including alleged irregularities in measures under section 13(4), cannot be adjudicated at that stage and must be pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal under section 17. An order that examined the merits of such non-compliance went beyond the limited scope of section 14 and was contrary to binding law; the rejection of the application was set aside and directions were issued to proceed under section 14.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>