https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215025 The court held that the appellant is entitled to inspect the asset details of IAS officers under Rule 16 of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, emphasizing transparency and accountability in governance. The court rejected the argument that such information is confidential, emphasizing the public's right to know about government officials' assets. The court ordered the appellant's request for inspection to be granted, provided specific officers are named, highlighting the importance of public interest and transparency in a democratic system. en-us Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 May 2012 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215025 The court held that the appellant is entitled to inspect the asset details of IAS officers under Rule 16 of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, emphasizing transparency and accountability in governance. The court rejected the argument that such information is confidential, emphasizing the public's right to know about government officials' assets. The court ordered the appellant's request for inspection to be granted, provided specific officers are named, highlighting the importance of public interest and transparency in a democratic system. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215025