<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 632 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215016</link>
    <description>Failure to file annual returns, balance sheets and profit and loss accounts under the Companies Act was treated as a completed default on expiry of the statutory filing period, not a continuing offence. A daily measure of penalty during the period of default did not make the non-compliance revive each day or exclude limitation. On that basis, the criminal limitation period under procedural law applied, and cognisance taken after an extended delay was barred. The prosecution could not be sustained because the statutory breach was complete once and for all, even though its legal consequences continued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 632 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215016</link>
      <description>Failure to file annual returns, balance sheets and profit and loss accounts under the Companies Act was treated as a completed default on expiry of the statutory filing period, not a continuing offence. A daily measure of penalty during the period of default did not make the non-compliance revive each day or exclude limitation. On that basis, the criminal limitation period under procedural law applied, and cognisance taken after an extended delay was barred. The prosecution could not be sustained because the statutory breach was complete once and for all, even though its legal consequences continued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>