https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215011 The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to comply with the statutory requirements under sections 18 and 19 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Company Law Board (CLB) concluded that it lacked the legal authority to condone the delay or revive the expired order dated 23rd April, 1983. Consequently, the CLB dismissed the petition, stating that the reliefs sought were inconsistent with the statutory provisions. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215011 The petition was dismissed as the petitioner failed to comply with the statutory requirements under sections 18 and 19 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Company Law Board (CLB) concluded that it lacked the legal authority to condone the delay or revive the expired order dated 23rd April, 1983. Consequently, the CLB dismissed the petition, stating that the reliefs sought were inconsistent with the statutory provisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215011