<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 844 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215005</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company appeal challenging the CLB&#039;s order on the maintainability of a composite company petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The court held that the objections raised by the appellant were premature and should be examined after the filing of a reply to the petition. Emphasizing the importance of a detailed examination of the dispute, the court refused to entertain the appeal, stating that the appellant was not aggrieved by the preliminary order. The judgment underscored the significance of allowing the proceedings before the CLB to continue without premature interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 844 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215005</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company appeal challenging the CLB&#039;s order on the maintainability of a composite company petition under sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act. The court held that the objections raised by the appellant were premature and should be examined after the filing of a reply to the petition. Emphasizing the importance of a detailed examination of the dispute, the court refused to entertain the appeal, stating that the appellant was not aggrieved by the preliminary order. The judgment underscored the significance of allowing the proceedings before the CLB to continue without premature interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=215005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>