https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214989 The court concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The Gauhati High Court did not have jurisdiction over the dispute pending before the Company Law Board in Delhi, despite the respondent-company being registered in Shillong. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies under sections 10-F and 405 of the Companies Act in the appropriate forum. The interim order was vacated, and no costs were awarded. en-us Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214989 The court concluded that the writ petition was not maintainable due to lack of territorial jurisdiction. The Gauhati High Court did not have jurisdiction over the dispute pending before the Company Law Board in Delhi, despite the respondent-company being registered in Shillong. The court dismissed the writ petition, allowing the petitioner to pursue alternative remedies under sections 10-F and 405 of the Companies Act in the appropriate forum. The interim order was vacated, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214989