<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 841 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214982</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka allowed Company Petition 27/2011 and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation with conditions. The petitioner company, Siemens BPO Services Pvt. Ltd., must file audited accounts for 1.10.2010 to 30.09.2011 with the Regional Director and Registrar of Companies by 30.11.2011. The Official Liquidator will audit these accounts, and any discrepancies may lead to order modifications. The court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to safeguard shareholder and public interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 841 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214982</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka allowed Company Petition 27/2011 and sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation with conditions. The petitioner company, Siemens BPO Services Pvt. Ltd., must file audited accounts for 1.10.2010 to 30.09.2011 with the Regional Director and Registrar of Companies by 30.11.2011. The Official Liquidator will audit these accounts, and any discrepancies may lead to order modifications. The court emphasized compliance with statutory requirements to safeguard shareholder and public interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214982</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>