https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214981 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision that the television show in question was not in a dominant market position and that there was no violation of the Competition Act. The Competition Appellate Tribunal (Comp. AT) had previously dismissed the proceedings as infructuous and affirmed the CCI's conclusions. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments against the CCI and Comp. AT's decisions, noting that the CCI's findings were based on valid grounds and that the Division Bench's observations did not mandate an investigation. The petitioner was directed to deposit costs with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers' Social Security & Welfare Fund. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214981 The court dismissed the petitioner's appeal, upholding the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) decision that the television show in question was not in a dominant market position and that there was no violation of the Competition Act. The Competition Appellate Tribunal (Comp. AT) had previously dismissed the proceedings as infructuous and affirmed the CCI's conclusions. The court found no merit in the petitioner's arguments against the CCI and Comp. AT's decisions, noting that the CCI's findings were based on valid grounds and that the Division Bench's observations did not mandate an investigation. The petitioner was directed to deposit costs with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers' Social Security & Welfare Fund. Case-Laws Law of Competition Fri, 16 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214981