<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 965 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214975</link>
    <description>The court determined that the disputed claim amount of Rs. 50,08,921 belonged to the petitioning creditor and was retained by the Company. The judgment allowed the Company four weeks to provide a bank guarantee to secure the claimed amount, failing which the petitioning creditor could proceed with the winding up petition. The interpretation of the agreement dated 14-9-2009 was crucial in understanding the adjustments and supplies between the parties, with the court emphasizing the need for fairness and opportunity for defense in winding up applications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 16:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 965 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214975</link>
      <description>The court determined that the disputed claim amount of Rs. 50,08,921 belonged to the petitioning creditor and was retained by the Company. The judgment allowed the Company four weeks to provide a bank guarantee to secure the claimed amount, failing which the petitioning creditor could proceed with the winding up petition. The interpretation of the agreement dated 14-9-2009 was crucial in understanding the adjustments and supplies between the parties, with the court emphasizing the need for fairness and opportunity for defense in winding up applications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>