https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214969 A petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a criminal complaint and summoning order on the basis that the petitioner was neither a director nor in charge of the company. The petitioner denied any connection with the company and relied on records disputing directorship, while the respondent pointed to correspondence and documents naming him as a director, including a resignation letter attributed to him. Because the petitioner's role in the company depended on disputed facts requiring evidence, the issue could not be decided in quashing proceedings. The complaint and summoning order were therefore sustained. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Jun 2012 07:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214969 A petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a criminal complaint and summoning order on the basis that the petitioner was neither a director nor in charge of the company. The petitioner denied any connection with the company and relied on records disputing directorship, while the respondent pointed to correspondence and documents naming him as a director, including a resignation letter attributed to him. Because the petitioner's role in the company depended on disputed facts requiring evidence, the issue could not be decided in quashing proceedings. The complaint and summoning order were therefore sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214969