<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 493 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214923</link>
    <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision to tax the cash credits as the assessee&#039;s income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, despite creditors confirming the loans. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s argument that the cash credits should be accepted as genuine based on creditor confirmations, emphasizing the importance of providing a satisfactory explanation for such entries. Additionally, the court clarified the distinct applicability of sections 68 and 69 in assessing income sources and dismissed the appeal, affirming the authorities&#039; findings that the cash credits were not genuine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2012 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 493 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214923</link>
      <description>The court upheld the authorities&#039; decision to tax the cash credits as the assessee&#039;s income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, despite creditors confirming the loans. The court rejected the appellant&#039;s argument that the cash credits should be accepted as genuine based on creditor confirmations, emphasizing the importance of providing a satisfactory explanation for such entries. Additionally, the court clarified the distinct applicability of sections 68 and 69 in assessing income sources and dismissed the appeal, affirming the authorities&#039; findings that the cash credits were not genuine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>