<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 480 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance of car and telephone expenses to 1/10th and deleting the addition of income under Section 68. The appellant successfully proved the business nature of expenses and the genuineness of the gift received, meeting the onus of proof required. The judgments were pronounced on 8th June 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 10:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 480 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, reducing the disallowance of car and telephone expenses to 1/10th and deleting the addition of income under Section 68. The appellant successfully proved the business nature of expenses and the genuineness of the gift received, meeting the onus of proof required. The judgments were pronounced on 8th June 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>