<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 477 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasizes the importance of proactive disclosure by importers and the need for authorities to consider the context before imposing penalties or confiscation in cases of mis-declaration of imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 477 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and allowed the appeal, providing consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment emphasizes the importance of proactive disclosure by importers and the need for authorities to consider the context before imposing penalties or confiscation in cases of mis-declaration of imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>