<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 475 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214905</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority, which had previously dismissed the appeal due to non-condonation of delay. The Tribunal found the justifications provided by the appellant for the delay acceptable and remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits of the case. The first appellate authority was directed to restore the stay petition and appeal in their record and decide the case following the principles of natural justice. Ultimately, the stay petition and appeal were allowed through remand for a fresh consideration on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 475 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214905</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the first appellate authority, which had previously dismissed the appeal due to non-condonation of delay. The Tribunal found the justifications provided by the appellant for the delay acceptable and remanded the matter back to the first appellate authority for a decision on the merits of the case. The first appellate authority was directed to restore the stay petition and appeal in their record and decide the case following the principles of natural justice. Ultimately, the stay petition and appeal were allowed through remand for a fresh consideration on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214905</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>