https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214904 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of sugar and molasses, in a dispute concerning the treatment of bio-compost under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the show cause notices were defective as they did not specify the inputs used in the production of bio-compost. Relying on a precedent from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for payment of 5% of the sale value under Rule 6(3) was incorrect. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214904 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of sugar and molasses, in a dispute concerning the treatment of bio-compost under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal found that the show cause notices were defective as they did not specify the inputs used in the production of bio-compost. Relying on a precedent from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for payment of 5% of the sale value under Rule 6(3) was incorrect. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214904