https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214902 The appellant was held liable for service tax on courier services despite M/s. Professional Couriers' claim of providing co-loader services only. The appellant's participation in the dispute resolution scheme was seen as accepting liability. The appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected. The original authority was instructed to reconsider the matter in light of a certificate provided by M/s. Professional Couriers, emphasizing the need for a fresh adjudication allowing both parties to present their cases. The judgment set aside the previous order and remanded the case for a new decision based on the evidence presented. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2012 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214902 The appellant was held liable for service tax on courier services despite M/s. Professional Couriers' claim of providing co-loader services only. The appellant's participation in the dispute resolution scheme was seen as accepting liability. The appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) was rejected. The original authority was instructed to reconsider the matter in light of a certificate provided by M/s. Professional Couriers, emphasizing the need for a fresh adjudication allowing both parties to present their cases. The judgment set aside the previous order and remanded the case for a new decision based on the evidence presented. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214902