<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214899</link>
    <description>Completion and finishing services such as interior, civil, electrical, carpentry, tiling, wiring and renovation work were held not taxable under the pre-16.6.2005 definition of construction service in Section 65(30a) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal reasoned that the later insertion of the expanded commercial or industrial construction service category under Section 65(25b), which expressly included completion and finishing services, showed that such work was brought into the tax net only from 16.6.2005. Accepting that reading, it treated the earlier provision as not covering these services for the prior period, and the assessee succeeded on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188290" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 469 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214899</link>
      <description>Completion and finishing services such as interior, civil, electrical, carpentry, tiling, wiring and renovation work were held not taxable under the pre-16.6.2005 definition of construction service in Section 65(30a) of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal reasoned that the later insertion of the expanded commercial or industrial construction service category under Section 65(25b), which expressly included completion and finishing services, showed that such work was brought into the tax net only from 16.6.2005. Accepting that reading, it treated the earlier provision as not covering these services for the prior period, and the assessee succeeded on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>