https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214839 A chartered accountant was found guilty of professional misconduct and other misconduct where he admitted acting as director and authorised signatory of the investment companies, which operated from his office, and the record showed his active involvement in inducing investments, accepting substantial funds, and issuing dishonoured post-dated cheques. The High Court held that the disciplinary material had been supplied, written representations considered, and the procedure under the Act followed, so the belated complaint of denial of cross-examination failed. The findings were upheld and the recommendation to remove his name from membership for one year was approved. en-us Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214839 A chartered accountant was found guilty of professional misconduct and other misconduct where he admitted acting as director and authorised signatory of the investment companies, which operated from his office, and the record showed his active involvement in inducing investments, accepting substantial funds, and issuing dishonoured post-dated cheques. The High Court held that the disciplinary material had been supplied, written representations considered, and the procedure under the Act followed, so the belated complaint of denial of cross-examination failed. The findings were upheld and the recommendation to remove his name from membership for one year was approved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214839