<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 376 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214803</link>
    <description>Development agreements coupled with powers of attorney may constitute a transfer for capital gains purposes where the developer receives effective possession and general control in part performance of the contract. Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act applies with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act where contractual rights permit entry, approvals, development and dealings in the project. Exclusive possession is not required; concurrent possession can suffice if the transferee effectively controls the property and is willing to perform contractual obligations. On the stated facts, effective possession was treated as handed over, and the capital gains addition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 376 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214803</link>
      <description>Development agreements coupled with powers of attorney may constitute a transfer for capital gains purposes where the developer receives effective possession and general control in part performance of the contract. Section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act applies with section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act where contractual rights permit entry, approvals, development and dealings in the project. Exclusive possession is not required; concurrent possession can suffice if the transferee effectively controls the property and is willing to perform contractual obligations. On the stated facts, effective possession was treated as handed over, and the capital gains addition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>