<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 372 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214799</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the findings of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the Assessee firm was a genuine partnership firm and not an Association of Persons. It was established in compliance with legal requirements and not for tax evasion purposes. The Court also agreed that the payments made to partners were not excessive or unreasonable, as they were in accordance with contractual agreements. The formation of the respondent-firm through a Consortium Agreement was deemed legitimate, as it was a prerequisite set by MIDC. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial questions of law were identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 372 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214799</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the findings of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) that the Assessee firm was a genuine partnership firm and not an Association of Persons. It was established in compliance with legal requirements and not for tax evasion purposes. The Court also agreed that the payments made to partners were not excessive or unreasonable, as they were in accordance with contractual agreements. The formation of the respondent-firm through a Consortium Agreement was deemed legitimate, as it was a prerequisite set by MIDC. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial questions of law were identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>