<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 371 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 10,10,000 out of the total Rs. 43,80,000 unexplained cash credit, as the appellant failed to prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of certain loans. The remaining addition of Rs. 33,70,000 was deleted by the CIT(A) after finding sufficient evidence to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of those transactions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 371 - ITAT, AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the addition of Rs. 10,10,000 out of the total Rs. 43,80,000 unexplained cash credit, as the appellant failed to prove the creditworthiness and genuineness of certain loans. The remaining addition of Rs. 33,70,000 was deleted by the CIT(A) after finding sufficient evidence to establish the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of those transactions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>