<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 359 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214786</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed on the assessee-company under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for reducing its claim under section 80IB was unjustified. The Tribunal ruled that there were no inaccurate particulars of income furnished by the assessee, leading to the deletion of the penalty for both assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Tribunal emphasized that claiming excessive deductions does not automatically warrant penalties, and as there were no false details in the return, the penalty was deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 359 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214786</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed on the assessee-company under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for reducing its claim under section 80IB was unjustified. The Tribunal ruled that there were no inaccurate particulars of income furnished by the assessee, leading to the deletion of the penalty for both assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Tribunal emphasized that claiming excessive deductions does not automatically warrant penalties, and as there were no false details in the return, the penalty was deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>