<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 353 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214780</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the ld.Commissioner(Appeals) for a fresh decision on the merits without requiring pre-deposit, emphasizing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of, focusing on procedural compliance and thorough examination of the case merits without imposing undue financial burdens on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 353 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214780</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the matter to the ld.Commissioner(Appeals) for a fresh decision on the merits without requiring pre-deposit, emphasizing a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal was allowed, and the stay petition was disposed of, focusing on procedural compliance and thorough examination of the case merits without imposing undue financial burdens on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214780</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>