https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214775 The case involved the denial of cenvat credit for service tax due to missing information on invoices and excess credit availed. The appellant, though absent during the hearing, submitted written requests for consideration. The court found that certain deficiencies in invoices could be condoned under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for verification, with the requirement for pre-deposit waived. The stay petition was granted, allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case properly before the authority. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jun 2012 18:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214775 The case involved the denial of cenvat credit for service tax due to missing information on invoices and excess credit availed. The appellant, though absent during the hearing, submitted written requests for consideration. The court found that certain deficiencies in invoices could be condoned under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for verification, with the requirement for pre-deposit waived. The stay petition was granted, allowing the appellants an opportunity to present their case properly before the authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214775