<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 342 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214769</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of dividend income by the AO, as the income was proven to be from specific mutual funds. Additionally, the ITAT restricted the disallowance under sec. 14A to a nominal amount, emphasizing the need for reasonableness and case-specific analysis. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=188161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 342 - ITAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214769</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of dividend income by the AO, as the income was proven to be from specific mutual funds. Additionally, the ITAT restricted the disallowance under sec. 14A to a nominal amount, emphasizing the need for reasonableness and case-specific analysis. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed in both issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=214769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>